Leora Levy is wrong about the November ballot and Trump

I would like to correct a statement – a lie – made by US Senator candidate Leora Levy, the Republican candidate against incumbent US Senator Richard Blumenthal.

While heading to a local county fair recently, Levy, who was against Trump before she was for him, insisted she was on the ballot in Connecticut, not the former president, whose approval she trumpeted in August.

Of course, Levy, a savvy fundraiser for the GOP, would want to distance herself from the divisive former president, who is at the center of multiple investigations for taking classified documents, for pressuring campaign officials. for them to lie about the results of the campaign and for the role he played. played during the January 6 uprising. If we were anywhere other than Bizarro World, association with such a man would be political suicide. Yet Trump is hiding, his small hands clinging to a frayed public life, inserting himself into political discussion even when the Republican candidates don’t really want him. See JD Vance in Ohio.

This is an especially tricky situation for Connecticut Republicans, who pride themselves on practicing the measured politics of fiscal conservatism, while voting liberal when creating and maintaining a social safety net. Historically, the Connecticut Republicans have always been the party you could count on to uphold the law. See Lowell Weicker, at the Watergate hearings. See Prescott Bush, McCarthy era.

But then came Donald Trump, a Democrat before being a Republican, who brought a toxic mix of faux machismo and obnoxious oiliness that proved to be intoxicating drink for the supposedly forgotten voter. Even the Connecticut GOP was not immune. The state party’s sad metamorphosis led Esquire magazine in August to lament that we “don’t do Connecticut Republicans like they used to.”

No. We don’t, although we still have a few. Elsewhere, too many Republicans seem to be of the everyday garden variety, embracing a party ideology that replaces politics with public taunts and measured talk with temper tantrums.

See Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and his attempt to federally fund human trafficking.

Levy knows that as a Connecticut candidate, you can’t be a little pro-Trump any more than you can be a little pregnant. Trump has a strong presence on the ballot, and we’re waiting to see if this could be the election that eradicates his foul stench forever. For his part, Trump has pinned his hopes on candidates such as Levy, whom he endorsed in August.

He certainly runs, and in Connecticut, he loses. Last week, an Emerson College poll gave Blumenthal a 13-point lead. It’s somewhere between bombing and spanking, and I’m not sure there are enough days left on the calendar for candidate Levy to distance herself from the black hole at the center of her party.

Additionally, when Levy said Trump was not on the ballot, she also said she and Trump were “completely in agreement” on the policy. At the time of her endorsement – made during a phone call at a barbecue just before the primary – Levy said she was “so honored, honored and humbled” to get this endorsement.

If you follow her on Twitter, Levy — much like Trump — seems to be against a lot of things, and quick with declarative statements about how awful things are in the state. She denounces the “awake nonsense” and the “fluidity of genres”. At this point, it’s impossible to see much light between Levy and his endorser, which should leave voters with little doubt about who and what they’re getting if they vote for Levy.

Levy is squeezing flesh and saying she’s the embodiment of the American dream. That’s wonderful. We could use more embodiments like this. But when you see Levy, ask her how she plans to help others achieve their American Dream. Ask her who won the 2020 presidential election. Ask her if she will accept the results of the midterm election. Ask him to define critical race theory, which seems to haunt his dreams. Ask her if she has any single political goal, other than beating Senator Blumenthal.

Lying, obfuscation and outlandish campaign promises are as much a part of politics as voting machines. A 2014 study looked at such speech and suggested that the things said during campaigns — even supposedly outlandish things — might have a purpose. The promises and assertions made in a stump speech can serve as cues for the candidate later. It’s something voters can come back to and say, “Wait. Didn’t you say you’d cut my taxes? In other words, campaign promises and claims can be ambitious.

But there is no indication that Levy is anything other than a Trump Republican. It cannot be erased, avoided or ignored. It’s Trump, all over the ticket.

Susan Campbell is the author of “Frog Hollow: Stories from an American Neighborhood”, “Tempest-Tossed: The Mind of Isabella Beecher Hooker”, and “Dating Jesus: A Story of Fundamentalism, Feminism and the American Girl”. She is Distinguished Lecturer at the University of New Haven, where she teaches journalism.

Source link

Edward L. Robinett