Lords beat Boris Johnson on care cap hitting poorest with ‘catastrophe’

Boris Johnson now faces another revolt from Tory MPs after his peers voted 198-158 for an amendment to the Health and Care Bill, ensuring the amount councils pay for care counts towards a cap of £86,000.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson talks to resident Kathleen during a visit to Westport Care Home in Stepney Green, east London

Boris Johnson suffered a crushing Lords defeat on his care cap tonight which will hit Red Wall residents with ‘catastrophic costs’.

Peers voted 198 to 158 to scrap a last-minute shake-up to its care home funding plan that will mean poorer people will pay more.

The Prime Minister will now be forced to either scrap the plan or force it through the Commons for a second time – despite a backlash from the Tories. When the upset last passed through the Commons in November, 19 Tory MPs rebelled.

The Health Foundation’s Anita Charlesworth said MPs must now reject the Tory reshuffle because they voted ‘in the dark’ before – but multiple reports now show it will devastate poorer residents.

She said: ‘The government amendment is a step in the wrong direction. It has substantial real-world consequences for those with fewer assets.’

Under Boris Johnson’s funded care plan, people will not have to pay more than £86,000 in their lifetime for care costs from October 2023.

But in a late change, ministers said anything councils pay for people care will not count towards the cap.







The PM will now be forced to either scrap the plan or force it through the Commons for a second time
(

Picture:

Getty Images)


A joint report by the Institute for Fiscal Studies and the Health Foundation said older people with modest levels of wealth will be hardest hit, facing “catastrophic costs”.

Those with assets, including their home, of £75,000 to £150,000 face the greatest loss of protection.

According to the study, someone with around £110,000 in assets could lose 78% of their total wealth even after the cap was put in place, while someone with £500,000 could only use 17. %.

Baroness Wheeler, her Labor colleague, said the upheaval was a ‘last-minute, hastily put together and ill-thought-out hodgepodge’ that was ‘bombarded’ across the Commons without sufficient scrutiny.

She added: ‘The bombshell of dropping key safeguarding…means that the poorest people will face the same costs of care as the wealthiest in society.

“Someone with assets of £100,000 loses almost everything, while someone with assets worth £1million and more will keep almost everything.”

A graph from DHSC suggests that someone with just over £100,000 in wealth will lose around 70% of that in a decade, compared to just under 60% in previously proposed reforms.

The government insists that other people will be better off – and everyone will be better off than the current system.

It was one of many peer defeats inflicted on the Conservative government over the Health and Care Bill.

Peers voted 187 to 143 for a decision led by former Conservative Health Secretary Lord Lansley to force ministers to implement initial plans for a social care cap by April next year .

The peers also backed a move to block coroners from accessing confidential “safe spaces” information collected by health investigators.







The graphs show how care home user assets will deplete under different conservative plans. The green line is the new plan, the orange line is the old plan, and the blue line is the way things are now
(

Picture:

Department of Health and Social Affairs)


The House of Lords backed moves to retain the current ‘safe haven’ for NHS data by 207 votes to 169, majority 38.

And the peers adopted an amendment requiring guarantees on the discharge of patients from the hospital, in particular by guaranteeing the consultation of caregivers.

Baroness Sal Brinton, Liberal Democrat spokesperson for the Lords for Health, said: ‘The plans of this Conservative government fall far short of Boris Johnson’s election promise on the steps of Downing Street to ‘solve’ the current health crisis. social care. These unfair and divisive plans will not prevent people from having to sell their homes to pay for care and are another broken promise.

“Tonight’s vote shows that Liberal Democrats and others are fighting hard for a just and long-term solution to the welfare crisis and holding this government to account.”

Read more

Read more


Source link

Edward L. Robinett